Introducing our 2026 Road Management Plan

The new plan will take effect from Wednesday 1 April 2026 – see the adopted Road Management Plan.

In 2025, we asked for your feedback on updating the plan. Thank you to everyone who shared their views during community consultation. You can also read the changes we made based on your feedback.

About the plan

This plan sets out how we inspect, maintain and repair Council-managed local streets, pathways, kerbs and channels, and other road assets. The Road Management Plan doesn’t include main arterial roads or freeways. These are owned, managed and maintained by the Department of Transport and Planning (DTP).

Councils are required to review this plan every 4 years. This important work makes sure our community can safely move around our suburbs on foot and in vehicles.


Find out who owns each road in Boroondara

See which roads are managed by Council or the Department of Transport and Planning:


Report an issue


Community consultation

We consulted the community for 6 weeks between October and December 2025 to seek feedback on the draft plan.

We received 23 submissions. which raised 20 separate issues. Half of these submissions were about the Road Management Plan and the other half were about topics that are being dealt with separately.

Who we heard from

  • 343 people visited this page during the consultation
  • 23 people took part in the survey and all live in Boroondara.

What we heard

Half of the submissions related directly to the draft Road Management Plan. Many of these nominated specific locations for repair rather than commenting on the proposed thresholds for repair:

  • Locations managed by Council have been referred for inspection. Some of the locations nominated are not the responsibility of Council and are owned and managed by the DTP. We have referred these to the Victorian Government. The specific locations were:
    • the intersection of Glenferrie and Cotham roads
    • the intersection of Belmore and Union roads. The road safety concerns for this corner have also been reported to the Victorian Government.
  • About half of the submissions raised other topics, particularly the materials used to maintain roads. Road materials are addressed in the Road Materials Policy 2025.

The submissions have been grouped by topic in the consultation summary below.

How consultation was promoted

We promoted the consultation by emailing an alert to people signed up to this website, whose interests match this topic.


Updating the plan based on your feedback

The feedback shared during the consultation has helped shape the updated plan in the following ways:

  • How we maintain dedicated on-road bike lanes: The standard for dedicated, marked on-road bike lanes will be the same as for shared paths when addressing potholes and other defects. This will not be applied on roads where there isn’t a dedicated bike lane.
  • Managing vegetation hanging over roads and paths:
    • A new clause has been added to clarify Council and property owner responsibilities to distinguish between street trees managed by Council and vegetation from private property managed by the owner.
    • Response time for clearing vegetation by contractors has been updated.
  • Road hierarchy: This has been reviewed and has been updated to be consistent with our Traffic Management Policy (PDF).

Consultation summary – Submissions to the draft Road Management Plan 2026

Below is the full list of comments submitted by consultation participants, displayed by topic. Some participants addressed more than one topic in their comments.

Topic Submission received Action taken
Updating reference to Boroondara Bicycle Strategy
5.1 references the 2008 Boroondara Bicycle Strategy. This is out of date, council adopted a new one in 2022.

Draft plan amended to refer to Bicycle Strategy 2022.

Updating road hierarchy for consistency Appendix A: the road hierarchy needs to be reviewed to see if it still meets community expectations. For example, some roads marked as 'collector' may not need to be a 'collector' road any longer.

Definition of local road in RMP hierarchy amended to be consistent with Boroondara Traffic Management Policy.

How we inspect the condition of Council roads and paths There must be a requirement that road and path assets are inspected by walking and cycling. Driving in a car gives only one perspective on a road user experience of a road. For example, the condition of a road may seem acceptable driving in a car, but not when cycling. Asset inspections should be required by walking and cycling as well.

Footpath inspections are not done from a vehicle. The RMP requires that risk inspections of paths are carried out from the roadside and not the carriageway.

When we repair height differences to concrete laneways The threshold for repair of smaller height differences in concrete laneways should be further reduced, to say 25 mm.

No change to the proposed improvement of 50 mm. The purpose of laneways is to provide secondary vehicular access to properties. Maintaining laneways to a similar standard to footpaths is not considered effective use of limited resources.

Increasing inspection service standards of roads that have designated on-road bike lanes Pothole and defect service standards should be higher (inspected more often too) on routes that are designated cycling routes. The safe tolerance for a pothole and other road defects is much lower for a bike than a car.

Amend plan intervention levels for asphalt footpath/ shared paths to include dedicated on-road bike lanes.

It is not practicable to apply shared path standards to informal bicycle routes on roads where there are not dedicated lanes.

Increasing response times to height difference trigger of maintenance to roads No problem with the height difference trigger, however the response times should be faster, say 14 days in high traffic areas, and 21 days in low traffic areas.No change to 28/42 days proposed to draft. Response times are as for other path materials and limited by processes involving engagement of contractors.
Request for more maintenance and safety improvements

Make our paths SAFE. Fix our CRAPPY local roads.

Insufficient information to determine action.

Road definition: Volume of traffic on Walpole and Eglinton streets

The volume of traffic on Walpole and Eglinton Streets is not commensurate with the status of the road as a Local Access Road as set out in Road Hierarchy in Appendix A of the proposed Draft Road Management Plan. The traffic is disproportionate to the width of the road and the fact that these are residential streets. Walpole Street in particular is narrow and with cars parked on both sides of the road, vehicles cannot easily pass one another when travelling in opposite directions.

Significant through traffic occurs, including heavy trucks that can't navigate the roundabout on the corner of Walpole and Eglinton Streets satisfactorily and often will drive over it and over the corners of the street, leaving large tyre marks in the dirt. The amount of traffic greatly reduces the amenity of the street for residents, visually, as regards noise and also safety.

I would urge Council to undertake some monitoring and measurement of traffic movement in Walpole and Eglinton Streets with a view to considering ways to reduce the volume of through traffic and trucks that are using those streets as a ‘short cut’.

(this Submission has been abbreviated)

Definition of local road in RMP hierarchy amended to be consistent with Boroondara Traffic Management Policy.

Submission referred to Traffic and Transport for consideration of traffic controls.

The following feedback was received during the consultation and was addressed separately. However, it wasn’t relevant to be updated in the draft Road Management Plan (RMP).

Road materials

Submission received Action taken
In the Road Materials section, bluestone gutters, the policy does not currently consider cost or construction methods as factors in the management of the maintenance. In non-heritage areas the cost of using bluestone compared to concrete gutters is therefore not considered but should be. Hand placed bluestone gutters are considerably more costly than a concrete construction. In both heritage and non-heritage areas the method of duplicating the heritage look is not considered. It is not necessary to use hand placed stone to create the same look and function. Pre-assembled panels with the same look should be considered. These are coloured and moulded concrete (or other material) panels lifted into position previously made in the factory
The Road Materials Policy is a separate document that was adopted by Council on 22 September 2025. Costs of relaying bluestone kerbs were evaluated and were an important factor in determining the final policy. The costs of relaying bluestone is in fact similar to constructing new concrete kerb provided the existing pitchers can and/or bluestone retrieved from other renewal projects be reused.


Cycling network

We received 7 comments about our cycling network. These weren’t addressed in the RMP but were referred to our Traffic and Transport department for consideration.


Submission received Action taken
Restrict cyclists to the road system not through our parks. Cyclists make walking on paths dangerous given their propensity to travel too fast! Referred to Traffic and Transport department for consideration in relation to the Bicycle Strategy and response as appropriate.

Changes to the cycle network re outside scope of RMP.
Boroondara's roads should be made safe for cycling and the Greenways cycleways through its parklands should cease immediately. Whatever funds have been committed to it should be spent making the road network safe for cycling.

Referred to Traffic and Transport department for consideration in relation to the Bicycle Strategy and response as appropriate.

Changes to the cycle network re outside scope of RMP.

No mention of Greenways. A great many Boroondara residents enjoy, need and benefit from our parks and gardens. With Greenway Cycle highways through our parks, peace and tranquillity will be lost. Better to cater for safe cycling on main streets as happens in many other suburbs.

Referred to Traffic and Transport department for consideration in relation to the Bicycle Strategy and response as appropriate.

Changes to the cycle network re outside scope of RMP.

What investments will benefit / improve safety for cyclists?

Referred to Traffic and Transport department for consideration in relation to the Bicycle Strategy and response as appropriate.

Changes to the cycle network re outside scope of RMP.

Boroondara's local road network, which comprises most roads in the municipality, is not fit for purpose for cycling. There is nothing in the draft plan to indicate that this is a priority for the Council, but it should be. What we have instead is a destructive program, now mistitled "Greenways" by Council, which seeks to put three-metre-wide cycleways through our valuable parkland: A neat accommodation of the cycling lobby with the car lobby, but in reality, it has nothing to do with sustainable transport. Most significantly, it trashes our parkland and its function as an essential location for quiet and safe recreation in a natural vegetated environment. Funds that have been assigned to this project in 2025-26 should be re-allocated to make the local road network safe for cycling. This should be an ongoing program in future years to ensure that, as a matter of urgency, the local road network as a whole is made safe for cycling.

It appears that substantial cost savings should also be available in areas where Council continues to undertake unnecessary resheeting and replacement of kerb and channel in the local road network, a process that has been going on for many years.

Referred to Traffic and Transport department for consideration in relation to the Bicycle Strategy and response as appropriate.

Changes to the cycle network are outside scope of RMP.

I think that more attention (and funding) should be given to making Boroondara's roads much safer for cyclists, eg by creating dedicated cycle lanes along Collector and Secondary Roads and working with VicRoads re Arterial (Main) Roads.

I am not in favour of Council's new "Greenways" Plan, whereby 3 metre wide hard surface (concrete?) shared pathways, for both pedestrians and cyclists, will be progressively rolled out through Boroondara's parklands. Our Parklands and their existing pathways are much valued for their open space and passive recreation, used by walkers, dog-walkers, pedestrians of all ages and abilities. They should not be used for commuter cycling purposes, as this can lead to safety concerns and user conflicts and risks.

Referred to Traffic and Transport department for consideration in relation to the Bicycle Strategy and response as appropriate.

Infrastructure improvements to support cycling are outside scope of RMP.

Opposed to high-speed bicycle and motorised/battery powered scooters on pathways in public parks and gardens. Safety of pedestrians, pets etc more important than rider users.

Referred to Traffic and Transport department for consideration in relation to the Bicycle Strategy and response as appropriate.

Control of high-speed cycles and powered transportation on paths is outside scope of RMP.

Submission received Action taken
Harold Street is in very poor condition - and has been for some time. The plan needs to lead to prompt action to deal with this issue."
Harold Street is programmed for resurfacing this year (2025/26)
When will Harold Street in East Hawthorn be resurfaced?
Harold Street is programmed for resurfacing this year (2025/26)

Just an observation that the work recently carried out to repair the surface of Ward Street Ashburton was a good example of what I hope will be a continuing effort to preserve the appearance of concrete streets.

I hope this indicates an end to the previous policy of vandalizing these street surfaces with black tar vileness.

The RMP does not specify the materials to be used for filling potholes in concrete roads, which are covered by operational practices. Asphalt repairs will continue to be carried out in small areas as a cost-effective short-term repair, while larger-scale long-term repairs with concrete will be implemented as resources become available.
Submission received Action taken
Not only Asphalts BUT you should drive in Belmore Rd Cnr of Union and Belmore Rd and see the state of the Roads. Yet alone think you should look at putting a speed hump at that round about cars travelling so fast its ridiculous
Belmore Road is not a Council Road (DTP responsibility). We have referred this to the Victorian Government.
Fix the large pothole and associated potholes and badly damaged roadway on Burwood Road between the Glenferrie and Auburn Road intersections. The pothole on the southern side of the road is now deep and dangerous. Fix immediately please
This 800m section of arterial road is the responsibility of DTP which they maintain in accordance with their own RMP. Council has no input into this process.

Council should encourage VicRoads to:

Promptly repair Camberwell Junction roads

Promptly remove graffiti from VicRoads signs.
Requests for specific actions related to DTP roads are forwarded to them for action. DTP are an independent Road Authority that work to their own Road Management Plan and in many cases the intervention levels are less stringent than Council’s.

This has been reported many times, but no work has been done. At the intersection of Cotham Rd and Glenferrie Rd there is a large crack in the middle of the road on the Glenferrie Rd and children crossing have tripped.

(this Submission has been abbreviated)
Council has no responsibility for this area. The DTP is the coordinating authority for Glenferrie Rd and the cracks is at the interface with the tram tracks. We have referred this to the Victorian Government.
Topic Submission received Action taken
Vegetation management
Need to clarify policy/action on vegetation management in grassed laneways. Grass should not be sprayed (by contractor or Council staff) with herbicide where residents regularly mow a laneway.

Vegetation Management is outside scope of RMP.

Asset protection Utility and building companies held to account and made responsible for, returning a road surface/footpath disturbed by building/maintenance works to its original condition or better. To be completed immediately after completion of works and inspected one month later to rectify imperfections.

Council's responsibilities for utility assets are identified in the RMP and are consistent with the Road Management Act 2004.

Asset protection

Continual digging up or damaging by builders and unspecified organisations presumed to be related to utilities. Large stud steel plates are being attached to roads, nature strip's and footpaths with no identifying logo to show who put it there. Eg Toorak Road Glen Iris and various side streets.

Small potholes need to be repaired before they become big. This is a big problem on roads, often surface is broken up by private builders hired by private developers.

Council's responsibilities for utility assets are identified in the RMP and are consistent with the Road Management Act 2004.

Potholes are repaired as soon as practicable after notification.

Heritage

A large proportion of roads and kerbs in the City of Boroondara are subject to Heritage Overlays. There is no mention of Heritage Overlays in this document - I presume because the Roads and Materials Strategy Plan (??) passed earlier this year also gave only lip service to those roads and kerbs in Heritage Overlay areas.

(this Submission has been abbreviated)

The Scope of road management plans is defined in legislation and regulations and do not specifically include heritage considerations, which are more appropriately addressed through other plans, strategies and processes.

Bluestone laneways There has been no reference to bluestone laneways in this document which is a serious omission. please correct this.

For inspections, repairs and maintenance standards, bluestone laneways are managed the same as other material types.



FAQs